Czechia vs Latvia: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values

Czechia
17,136 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Latvia
20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Czechia rank
31st
Latvia rank
28th

Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time

  • Czechia
  • Latvia
05.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k201720202024

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 17,136 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Czechia, a difference of 3,636 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Czechia's.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 31st and Latvia ranks 28th of 35 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 19,420 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) 24,172 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) 4,752 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) Latvia
2020s 18,875 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) 22,780 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) 3,906 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Czechia or Latvia?
Latvia, at 20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 17,136 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Czechia as of 2024.
What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Czechia and Latvia?
3,636 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Latvia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
How do Czechia and Latvia rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
Czechia ranks 31st and Latvia ranks 28th of 35 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Latvia: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/disaggregated-final-energy-consumption-in-industry-calorific-values/czechia/latvia-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/disaggregated-final-energy-consumption-in-industry-calorific-values/czechia/latvia-2/">Czechia vs Latvia: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Unit
Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
35 places, 225 data points, 2017–2024
Last refreshed