Estonia vs Finland: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Estonia
10,537 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Finland
14,518 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Estonia rank
33rd
Finland rank
32nd
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Estonia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 14,518 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 10,537 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Estonia, a difference of 3,981 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
That makes Finland's figure about 1.4 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 33rd and Finland ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Estonia or Finland?
- Finland, at 14,518 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 10,537 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Estonia and Finland?
- 3,981 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Finland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Finland rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Estonia ranks 33rd and Finland ranks 32nd of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.