Finland vs Montenegro: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Finland
14,518 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Montenegro
10,026 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Finland rank
32nd
Montenegro rank
35th
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Finland
- Montenegro
How they compare
Finland currently reports 14,518 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 10,026 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Montenegro, a difference of 4,492 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
That makes Finland's figure about 1.4 times Montenegro's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 32nd and Montenegro ranks 35th of 35 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Finland or Montenegro?
- Finland, at 14,518 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 10,026 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Montenegro as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Finland and Montenegro?
- 4,492 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Montenegro?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Montenegro rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Finland ranks 32nd and Montenegro ranks 35th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.