Latvia vs Romania: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Latvia
20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Romania
21,964 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Latvia rank
28th
Romania rank
27th
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Latvia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 21,964 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Latvia, a difference of 1,192 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 28th and Romania ranks 27th of 35 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Latvia or Romania?
- Romania, at 21,964 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Latvia and Romania?
- 1,192 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Romania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Romania rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Latvia ranks 28th and Romania ranks 27th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.