Latvia vs Serbia: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Latvia
20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Serbia
22,683 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Latvia rank
28th
Serbia rank
25th
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Latvia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 22,683 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Latvia, a difference of 1,911 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 25th of 35 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 24,172 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) | 15,296 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) | 8,876 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) | Latvia |
| 2020s | 22,780 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) | 12,763 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) | 10,017 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Latvia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 22,683 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 20,772 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Latvia and Serbia?
- 1,911 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Serbia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Serbia rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Latvia ranks 28th and Serbia ranks 25th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.