Lithuania vs Moldova: Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values
Lithuania
25,728 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Moldova
24,943 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV)
in 2024
Lithuania rank
14th
Moldova rank
17th
Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values over time
- Lithuania
- Moldova
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 25,728 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 24,943 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Moldova, a difference of 785 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV).
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 14th and Moldova ranks 17th of 35 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values, Lithuania or Moldova?
- Lithuania, at 25,728 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) against 24,943 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV) in Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values between Lithuania and Moldova?
- 785 Megajoule per tonne (net calorific value - NCV), with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Moldova?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Moldova rank globally for disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values?
- Lithuania ranks 14th and Moldova ranks 17th of 35 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Disaggregated final energy consumption in industry - calorific values. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.