Angola vs Croatia: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Angola
4.1
in 2024
Croatia
3.49
in 2025
Angola rank
97th
Croatia rank
100th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Angola
- Croatia
How they compare
Angola currently reports 4.1 against 3.49 in Croatia, a difference of 0.61.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Croatia ahead.
Angola ranks 97th and Croatia ranks 100th of 204 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.715 | 6.4 | 5.68 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 3.26 | 4.56 | 1.3 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 4.13 | 4.74 | 0.604 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Angola or Croatia?
- Angola, at 4.1 against 3.49 in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Angola and Croatia?
- 0.61, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Croatia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Croatia rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Angola ranks 97th and Croatia ranks 100th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.