Aruba vs Maldives: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Aruba
0.83
in 2024
Maldives
0.79
in 2024
Aruba rank
137th
Maldives rank
139th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Aruba
- Maldives
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.83 against 0.79 in Maldives, a difference of 0.04.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 137th and Maldives ranks 139th of 208 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Maldives | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.871 | 0.269 | 0.602 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.805 | 0.56 | 0.245 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.828 | 0.788 | 0.04 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Aruba or Maldives?
- Aruba, at 0.83 against 0.79 in Maldives as of 2024.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Aruba and Maldives?
- 0.04, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Maldives?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Maldives rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Aruba ranks 137th and Maldives ranks 139th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.