Australia vs Malaysia: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Australia
175.76
in 2025
Malaysia
159.56
in 2025
Australia rank
16th
Malaysia rank
18th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Australia
- Malaysia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 175.76 against 159.56 in Malaysia, a difference of 16.2.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 16th and Malaysia ranks 18th of 204 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 159.01 | 39.62 | 119.39 | Australia |
| 2000s | 213.47 | 87.83 | 125.64 | Australia |
| 2010s | 218.2 | 131.47 | 86.73 | Australia |
| 2020s | 185.53 | 150.32 | 35.21 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Australia or Malaysia?
- Australia, at 175.76 against 159.56 in Malaysia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Australia and Malaysia?
- 16.2, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Malaysia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Malaysia rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Australia ranks 16th and Malaysia ranks 18th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.