Cook Islands vs Kiribati: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Cook Islands
0.02
in 2024
Kiribati
0.03
in 2024
Cook Islands rank
192nd
Kiribati rank
191st
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Cook Islands
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.03 against 0.02 in Cook Islands, a difference of 0.01.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.5 times Cook Islands's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cook Islands ahead.
Cook Islands ranks 192nd and Kiribati ranks 191st of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cook Islands averaged higher in 2 and Kiribati in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.03 | 0.021 | 0.009 | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 0.03 | 0.027 | 0.003 | Cook Islands |
| 2020s | 0.022 | 0.03 | 0.008 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Cook Islands or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 0.03 against 0.02 in Cook Islands as of 2024.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Cook Islands and Kiribati?
- 0.01, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Kiribati?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Cook Islands and Kiribati rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Cook Islands ranks 192nd and Kiribati ranks 191st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.