Cuba vs Jordan: Elec fossil nuclear renewables

Cuba
18.65
in 2024
Jordan
17.97
in 2024
Cuba rank
61st
Jordan rank
62nd

Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time

  • Cuba
  • Jordan
05101520200020122024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 18.65 against 17.97 in Jordan, a difference of 0.68.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 61st and Jordan ranks 62nd of 208 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s 15.46 10.15 5.31 Cuba
2010s 18.74 17.4 1.34 Cuba
2020s 17.56 17.42 0.144 Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Cuba or Jordan?
Cuba, at 18.65 against 17.97 in Jordan as of 2024.
What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Cuba and Jordan?
0.68, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Jordan?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Jordan rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
Cuba ranks 61st and Jordan ranks 62nd of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
210 places, 6,017 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed