Falkland Islands, Malvinas vs Kiribati: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Falkland Islands, Malvinas
0.01
in 2023
Kiribati
0.03
in 2024
Falkland Islands, Malvinas rank
194th
Kiribati rank
191st
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Falkland Islands, Malvinas
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.03 against 0.01 in Falkland Islands, Malvinas, a difference of 0.02.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 3.0 times Falkland Islands, Malvinas's.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
Falkland Islands, Malvinas ranks 194th and Kiribati ranks 191st of 208 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Falkland Islands, Malvinas | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.012 | 0.021 | 0.009 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 0.01 | 0.027 | 0.017 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0.01 | 0.03 | 0.02 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Falkland Islands, Malvinas or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 0.03 against 0.01 in Falkland Islands, Malvinas as of 2024.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Falkland Islands, Malvinas and Kiribati?
- 0.02, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Falkland Islands, Malvinas and Kiribati?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Falkland Islands, Malvinas and Kiribati rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Falkland Islands, Malvinas ranks 194th and Kiribati ranks 191st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.