Georgia vs Zambia: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Georgia
2.75
in 2025
Zambia
2.47
in 2024
Georgia rank
110th
Zambia rank
111th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Georgia
- Zambia
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 2.75 against 2.47 in Zambia, a difference of 0.28.
That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 110th and Zambia ranks 111th of 204 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.22 | 0.036 | 1.19 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 2.1 | 0.83 | 1.27 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 2.97 | 2.08 | 0.89 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Georgia or Zambia?
- Georgia, at 2.75 against 2.47 in Zambia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Georgia and Zambia?
- 0.28, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Zambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Zambia rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Georgia ranks 110th and Zambia ranks 111th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.