Guam vs Malta: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Guam
1.7
in 2024
Malta
1.84
in 2025
Guam rank
120th
Malta rank
119th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Guam
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 1.84 against 1.7 in Guam, a difference of 0.14.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Guam's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guam ahead.
Guam ranks 120th and Malta ranks 119th of 208 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.87 | 2.17 | 0.296 | Malta |
| 2010s | 1.73 | 1.8 | 0.065 | Malta |
| 2020s | 1.66 | 1.95 | 0.284 | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Guam or Malta?
- Malta, at 1.84 against 1.7 in Guam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Guam and Malta?
- 0.14, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Malta?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guam and Malta rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Guam ranks 120th and Malta ranks 119th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.