Kiribati vs Naoero: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Kiribati
0.03
in 2024
Naoero
0.04
in 2024
Kiribati rank
191st
Naoero rank
189th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Kiribati
- Naoero
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 0.04 against 0.03 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.01.
That makes Naoero's figure about 1.3 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Naoero ahead.
Kiribati ranks 191st and Naoero ranks 189th of 208 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.021 | 0.026 | 0.005 | Naoero |
| 2010s | 0.027 | 0.028 | 0.001 | Naoero |
| 2020s | 0.03 | 0.04 | 0.01 | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Kiribati or Naoero?
- Naoero, at 0.04 against 0.03 in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Kiribati and Naoero?
- 0.01, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Naoero?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Naoero rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Kiribati ranks 191st and Naoero ranks 189th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.