Kiribati vs Saint Helena: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Kiribati
0.03
in 2024
Saint Helena
0.01
in 2023
Kiribati rank
191st
Saint Helena rank
194th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Kiribati
- Saint Helena
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.03 against 0.01 in Saint Helena, a difference of 0.02.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 3.0 times Saint Helena's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Helena ahead.
Kiribati ranks 191st and Saint Helena ranks 194th of 208 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Saint Helena | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.021 | 0.01 | 0.011 | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 0.027 | 0.01 | 0.017 | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.02 | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Kiribati or Saint Helena?
- Kiribati, at 0.03 against 0.01 in Saint Helena as of 2024.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Kiribati and Saint Helena?
- 0.02, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Helena?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Kiribati and Saint Helena rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Kiribati ranks 191st and Saint Helena ranks 194th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.