Macau, China vs Timor-Leste: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Macau, China
0.54
in 2024
Timor-Leste
0.51
in 2024
Macau, China rank
148th
Timor-Leste rank
150th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Macau, China
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Macau, China currently reports 0.54 against 0.51 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.03.
That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.1 times Timor-Leste's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Macau, China ahead.
Macau, China ranks 148th and Timor-Leste ranks 150th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Macau, China averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macau, China | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.5 | 0.0857 | 1.41 | Macau, China |
| 2010s | 0.633 | 0.321 | 0.312 | Macau, China |
| 2020s | 0.386 | 0.508 | 0.122 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Macau, China or Timor-Leste?
- Macau, China, at 0.54 against 0.51 in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Macau, China and Timor-Leste?
- 0.03, with Macau, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and Timor-Leste?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Macau, China and Timor-Leste rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Macau, China ranks 148th and Timor-Leste ranks 150th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.