Maldives vs Suriname: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Maldives
0.79
in 2024
Suriname
0.82
in 2024
Maldives rank
139th
Suriname rank
138th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Maldives
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 0.82 against 0.79 in Maldives, a difference of 0.03.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 139th and Suriname ranks 138th of 208 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.269 | 0.581 | 0.312 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0.56 | 0.953 | 0.393 | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.788 | 0.988 | 0.2 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Maldives or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 0.82 against 0.79 in Maldives as of 2024.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Maldives and Suriname?
- 0.03, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Suriname?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Maldives and Suriname rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Maldives ranks 139th and Suriname ranks 138th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.