Mali vs Zimbabwe: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Mali
4.8
in 2024
Zimbabwe
4.4
in 2024
Mali rank
89th
Zimbabwe rank
91st
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Mali
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Mali currently reports 4.8 against 4.4 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.4.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Mali ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 208 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.93 | 3.4 | 2.47 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 1.43 | 3.93 | 2.5 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 3.37 | 3.4 | 0.032 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Mali or Zimbabwe?
- Mali, at 4.8 against 4.4 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 0.4, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Mali and Zimbabwe rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Mali ranks 89th and Zimbabwe ranks 91st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.