Montserrat vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Montserrat
0.01
in 2024
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
0.01
in 2023
Montserrat rank
194th
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha rank
194th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Montserrat
- Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
How they compare
Montserrat currently reports 0.01 against 0.01 in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 0.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha has been ahead every year.
Montserrat ranks 194th and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 194th of 208 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montserrat | Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Montserrat or Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
- Montserrat, at 0.01 against 0.01 in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha as of 2024.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Montserrat and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
- 0, with Montserrat ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montserrat and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Montserrat and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Montserrat ranks 194th and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 194th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.