Qatar vs Singapore: Elec fossil nuclear renewables
Qatar
53.9
in 2025
Singapore
56.85
in 2025
Qatar rank
39th
Singapore rank
38th
Elec fossil nuclear renewables over time
- Qatar
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 56.85 against 53.9 in Qatar, a difference of 2.95.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Qatar ranks 39th and Singapore ranks 38th of 204 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2 | 36.49 | 21.3 | Singapore |
| 2010s | 39.42 | 48.26 | 8.85 | Singapore |
| 2020s | 52.93 | 54.76 | 1.83 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher elec fossil nuclear renewables, Qatar or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 56.85 against 53.9 in Qatar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in elec fossil nuclear renewables between Qatar and Singapore?
- 2.95, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Singapore?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Qatar and Singapore rank globally for elec fossil nuclear renewables?
- Qatar ranks 39th and Singapore ranks 38th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Elec fossil nuclear renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.