Belarus vs Lithuania: Electric power consumption
Belarus
4,198 kWh per capita
in 2023
Lithuania
4,387 kWh per capita
in 2024
Belarus rank
54th
Lithuania rank
51st
Electric power consumption over time
- Belarus
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 4,387 kWh per capita against 4,198 kWh per capita in Belarus, a difference of 189 kWh per capita.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 54th and Lithuania ranks 51st of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3,378 kWh per capita | 2,974 kWh per capita | 404.26 kWh per capita | Belarus |
| 2000s | 3,203 kWh per capita | 3,181 kWh per capita | 22.33 kWh per capita | Belarus |
| 2010s | 3,649 kWh per capita | 3,898 kWh per capita | 249.31 kWh per capita | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 3,990 kWh per capita | 4,439 kWh per capita | 449.25 kWh per capita | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electric power consumption, Belarus or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 4,387 kWh per capita against 4,198 kWh per capita in Belarus as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electric power consumption between Belarus and Lithuania?
- 189 kWh per capita, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Lithuania?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Lithuania rank globally for electric power consumption?
- Belarus ranks 54th and Lithuania ranks 51st of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Electric power consumption (kWh per capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electric power consumption measures the production of power plants and combined heat and power plants less transmission, distribution, and transformation losses and own use by heat and power plants.