Cuba vs Tajikistan: Electric power consumption
Cuba
1,462 kWh per capita
in 2023
Tajikistan
1,497 kWh per capita
in 2023
Cuba rank
99th
Tajikistan rank
97th
Electric power consumption over time
- Cuba
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Tajikistan currently reports 1,497 kWh per capita against 1,462 kWh per capita in Cuba, a difference of 35 kWh per capita.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Cuba ranks 99th and Tajikistan ranks 97th of 150 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 993.96 kWh per capita | 2,504 kWh per capita | 1,510 kWh per capita | Tajikistan |
| 2000s | 1,218 kWh per capita | 2,061 kWh per capita | 842.93 kWh per capita | Tajikistan |
| 2010s | 1,463 kWh per capita | 1,620 kWh per capita | 156.71 kWh per capita | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 1,439 kWh per capita | 1,512 kWh per capita | 73.16 kWh per capita | Tajikistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electric power consumption, Cuba or Tajikistan?
- Tajikistan, at 1,497 kWh per capita against 1,462 kWh per capita in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in electric power consumption between Cuba and Tajikistan?
- 35 kWh per capita, with Tajikistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Tajikistan?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Tajikistan rank globally for electric power consumption?
- Cuba ranks 99th and Tajikistan ranks 97th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- IEA Energy Statistics Data Browser, International Energy Agency (IEA), published as Electric power consumption (kWh per capita). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electric power consumption measures the production of power plants and combined heat and power plants less transmission, distribution, and transformation losses and own use by heat and power plants.