Aruba vs Macao: Electricity generation from coal
Aruba
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Macao
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Aruba rank
83rd
Macao rank
83rd
Electricity generation from coal over time
- Aruba
- Macao
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Macao, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Macao has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 83rd and Macao ranks 83rd of 207 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from coal, Aruba or Macao?
- Aruba, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from coal between Aruba and Macao?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Macao?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Macao rank globally for electricity generation from coal?
- Aruba ranks 83rd and Macao ranks 83rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours.