Kiribati vs Sweden: Electricity generation from coal
Kiribati
0 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Sweden
0 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Kiribati rank
83rd
Sweden rank
83rd
Electricity generation from coal over time
- Kiribati
- Sweden
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Sweden, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 83rd and Sweden ranks 83rd of 207 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 1.29 terawatt-hours | 1.29 terawatt-hours | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0.47 terawatt-hours | 0.47 terawatt-hours | Sweden |
| 2020s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from coal, Kiribati or Sweden?
- Kiribati, at 0 terawatt-hours against 0 terawatt-hours in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from coal between Kiribati and Sweden?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Sweden?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Sweden rank globally for electricity generation from coal?
- Kiribati ranks 83rd and Sweden ranks 83rd of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours.