Aruba vs Suriname: Electricity generation from fossil fuels
Aruba
0.83 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Suriname
0.82 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Aruba rank
142nd
Suriname rank
143rd
Electricity generation from fossil fuels over time
- Aruba
- Suriname
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.83 terawatt-hours against 0.82 terawatt-hours in Suriname, a difference of 0.01 terawatt-hours.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 142nd and Suriname ranks 143rd of 210 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.871 terawatt-hours | 0.581 terawatt-hours | 0.29 terawatt-hours | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.805 terawatt-hours | 0.953 terawatt-hours | 0.148 terawatt-hours | Suriname |
| 2020s | 0.828 terawatt-hours | 0.988 terawatt-hours | 0.16 terawatt-hours | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from fossil fuels, Aruba or Suriname?
- Aruba, at 0.83 terawatt-hours against 0.82 terawatt-hours in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from fossil fuels between Aruba and Suriname?
- 0.01 terawatt-hours, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Suriname?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Suriname rank globally for electricity generation from fossil fuels?
- Aruba ranks 142nd and Suriname ranks 143rd of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from fossil fuels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in terawatt-hours.