Guam vs Sweden: Electricity generation from fossil fuels
Guam
1.7 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Sweden
2.08 terawatt-hours
in 2025
Guam rank
121st
Sweden rank
117th
Electricity generation from fossil fuels over time
- Guam
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 2.08 terawatt-hours against 1.7 terawatt-hours in Guam, a difference of 0.38 terawatt-hours.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.2 times Guam's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 121st and Sweden ranks 117th of 210 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.87 terawatt-hours | 5.71 terawatt-hours | 3.85 terawatt-hours | Sweden |
| 2010s | 1.73 terawatt-hours | 4.24 terawatt-hours | 2.51 terawatt-hours | Sweden |
| 2020s | 1.66 terawatt-hours | 2.56 terawatt-hours | 0.896 terawatt-hours | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from fossil fuels, Guam or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 2.08 terawatt-hours against 1.7 terawatt-hours in Guam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from fossil fuels between Guam and Sweden?
- 0.38 terawatt-hours, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Sweden?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Guam and Sweden rank globally for electricity generation from fossil fuels?
- Guam ranks 121st and Sweden ranks 117th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources β with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from fossil fuels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in terawatt-hours.