Kiribati vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Electricity generation from fossil fuels

Kiribati
0.03 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
0.01 terawatt-hours
in 2023
Kiribati rank
197th
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha rank
200th

Electricity generation from fossil fuels over time

  • Kiribati
  • Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
0.010.0150.020.0250.03200020122024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 0.03 terawatt-hours against 0.01 terawatt-hours in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 0.02 terawatt-hours.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 3.0 times Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ahead.

Kiribati ranks 197th and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 200th of 214 countries.

Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Difference Ahead
2000s 0.021 terawatt-hours 0.01 terawatt-hours 0.011 terawatt-hours Kiribati
2010s 0.027 terawatt-hours 0.01 terawatt-hours 0.017 terawatt-hours Kiribati
2020s 0.03 terawatt-hours 0.01 terawatt-hours 0.02 terawatt-hours Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from fossil fuels, Kiribati or Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
Kiribati, at 0.03 terawatt-hours against 0.01 terawatt-hours in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha as of 2024.
What is the difference in electricity generation from fossil fuels between Kiribati and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
0.02 terawatt-hours, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha rank globally for electricity generation from fossil fuels?
Kiribati ranks 197th and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 200th of 214 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from fossil fuels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Electricity generation from fossil fuels. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-fossil-fuels/kiribati/saint-helena/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-fossil-fuels/kiribati/saint-helena/">Kiribati vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Electricity generation from fossil fuels</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from fossil fuels
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
216 places, 6,239 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in terawatt-hours.