Rwanda vs South Sudan: Electricity generation from fossil fuels
Rwanda
0.57 terawatt-hours
in 2024
South Sudan
0.55 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Rwanda rank
151st
South Sudan rank
152nd
Electricity generation from fossil fuels over time
- Rwanda
- South Sudan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.57 terawatt-hours against 0.55 terawatt-hours in South Sudan, a difference of 0.02 terawatt-hours.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Sudan ahead.
Rwanda ranks 151st and South Sudan ranks 152nd of 214 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.3037 terawatt-hours | 0.515 terawatt-hours | 0.2113 terawatt-hours | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.462 terawatt-hours | 0.542 terawatt-hours | 0.08 terawatt-hours | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from fossil fuels, Rwanda or South Sudan?
- Rwanda, at 0.57 terawatt-hours against 0.55 terawatt-hours in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from fossil fuels between Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 0.02 terawatt-hours, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and South Sudan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and South Sudan rank globally for electricity generation from fossil fuels?
- Rwanda ranks 151st and South Sudan ranks 152nd of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from fossil fuels. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in terawatt-hours.