Aruba vs North Korea: Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal

Aruba
0.17 terawatt-hours
in 2024
North Korea
0.17 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Aruba rank
110th
North Korea rank
110th

Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal over time

  • Aruba
  • North Korea
00.050.10.150.2200020122024

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 0.17 terawatt-hours against 0.17 terawatt-hours in North Korea, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was North Korea ahead.

Aruba ranks 110th and North Korea ranks 110th of 212 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba North Korea Difference Ahead
2000s 0.003 terawatt-hours 0 terawatt-hours 0.003 terawatt-hours Aruba
2010s 0.146 terawatt-hours 0.028 terawatt-hours 0.118 terawatt-hours Aruba
2020s 0.17 terawatt-hours 0.14 terawatt-hours 0.03 terawatt-hours Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal, Aruba or North Korea?
Aruba, at 0.17 terawatt-hours against 0.17 terawatt-hours in North Korea as of 2024.
What is the difference in electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal between Aruba and North Korea?
0 terawatt-hours, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and North Korea?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Aruba and North Korea rank globally for electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal?
Aruba ranks 110th and North Korea ranks 110th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Ember (2026); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Pinto et al. (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs North Korea: Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal. Statizoid, drawing on Ember (2026); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Pinto et al. (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-solar-and-wind-compared-to-coal/aruba/korea-dem-people-s-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-generation-from-solar-and-wind-compared-to-coal/aruba/korea-dem-people-s-rep/">Aruba vs North Korea: Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal
Unit
terawatt-hours
Source
Ember (2026); Energy Institute - Statistical Review of World Energy (2026); Pinto et al. (2023) – with major processing by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
214 places, 6,906 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed

Measured in terawatt-hours.