Aruba vs Mauritius: Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal

Aruba
0.17
in 2024
Mauritius
0.18
in 2024
Aruba rank
110th
Mauritius rank
109th

Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal over time

  • Aruba
  • Mauritius
00.050.10.150.2200020122024

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.18 against 0.17 in Aruba, a difference of 0.01.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Mauritius ahead.

Aruba ranks 110th and Mauritius ranks 109th of 212 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Mauritius Difference Ahead
2000s 0.003 0 0.003 Aruba
2010s 0.146 0.036 0.11 Aruba
2020s 0.17 0.17 0 Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal, Aruba or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.18 against 0.17 in Aruba as of 2024.
What is the difference in electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal between Aruba and Mauritius?
0.01, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Mauritius?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Aruba and Mauritius rank globally for electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal?
Aruba ranks 110th and Mauritius ranks 109th of 212 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
214 places, 6,906 data points, 1920–2025
Last refreshed