Aruba vs Uganda: Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal
Aruba
0.17
in 2024
Uganda
0.17
in 2024
Aruba rank
110th
Uganda rank
110th
Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal over time
- Aruba
- Uganda
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.17 against 0.17 in Uganda, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uganda ahead.
Aruba ranks 110th and Uganda ranks 110th of 212 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.003 | 0.006 | 0.003 | Uganda |
| 2010s | 0.146 | 0.046 | 0.1 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 0.17 | 0.148 | 0.022 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal, Aruba or Uganda?
- Aruba, at 0.17 against 0.17 in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal between Aruba and Uganda?
- 0, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Uganda?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Aruba and Uganda rank globally for electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal?
- Aruba ranks 110th and Uganda ranks 110th of 212 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from solar and wind compared to coal. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.