Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs Chinese Taipei: Electricity Installed Capacity, Megawatt

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
82,240
in 2023
Chinese Taipei
41,585
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) rank
17th
Chinese Taipei rank
19th

Electricity Installed Capacity, Megawatt over time

  • Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
  • Chinese Taipei
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k200020112023

How they compare

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) currently reports 82,240 against 41,585 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 40,655.

That makes Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)'s figure about 2.0 times Chinese Taipei's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has been ahead every year.

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 17th and Chinese Taipei ranks 19th of 21 groups.

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
2000s 47,612 31,478 16,134 Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
2010s 65,715 37,753 27,962 Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)
2020s 81,060 41,998 39,062 Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher electricity installed capacity, megawatt, Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) or Chinese Taipei?
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), at 82,240 against 41,585 in Chinese Taipei as of 2023.
What is the difference in electricity installed capacity, megawatt between Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Chinese Taipei?
40,655, with Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Chinese Taipei?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and Chinese Taipei rank globally for electricity installed capacity, megawatt?
Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) ranks 17th and Chinese Taipei ranks 19th of 21 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Electricity Installed Capacity, Megawatt (Fossil fuels). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs Chinese Taipei: Electricity Installed Capacity, Megawatt. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-installed-capacity-megawatt-fossil-fuels/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://energy.statizoid.com/compare/electricity-installed-capacity-megawatt-fossil-fuels/sub-saharan-africa-ssa/taiwan/">Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) vs Chinese Taipei: Electricity Installed Capacity, Megawatt</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Electricity Installed Capacity, Megawatt (Fossil fuels)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
247 places, 5,868 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

This dataset provides information on electricity generation and installed capacity, categorized by energy type (renewable and non-renewable) and five technology types (Fossil fuels, Hydropower, Solar energy, Wind energy, and Bioenergy). The data has been sourced from the International Renewable Energy Agency (https://pxweb.irena.org/pxweb/en/IRENASTAT). The indicators on energy transition have been formulated to help users understand the progress in the adoption of renewable energy sources vis-à-vis the increasing energy requirements.