Kiribati vs Nauru: Electricity generation from renewables
Kiribati
0.01 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Nauru
0.01 terawatt-hours
in 2024
Kiribati rank
181st
Nauru rank
181st
Electricity generation from renewables over time
- Kiribati
- Nauru
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0.01 terawatt-hours against 0.01 terawatt-hours in Nauru, a difference of 0 terawatt-hours.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Nauru ahead.
Kiribati ranks 181st and Nauru ranks 181st of 209 countries.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | — |
| 2010s | 0.001 terawatt-hours | 0 terawatt-hours | 0.001 terawatt-hours | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 0.01 terawatt-hours | 0.002 terawatt-hours | 0.008 terawatt-hours | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from renewables, Kiribati or Nauru?
- Kiribati, at 0.01 terawatt-hours against 0.01 terawatt-hours in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from renewables between Kiribati and Nauru?
- 0 terawatt-hours, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nauru?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Nauru rank globally for electricity generation from renewables?
- Kiribati ranks 181st and Nauru ranks 181st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from renewables. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Measured in terawatt-hours.