Belarus vs China: Energy intensity by sector
Belarus
4.6 MJ/2011 USD PPP
in 2012
China
4.51 MJ/2011 USD PPP
in 2012
Belarus rank
48th
China rank
49th
Energy intensity by sector over time
- Belarus
- China
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 4.6 MJ/2011 USD PPP against 4.51 MJ/2011 USD PPP in China, a difference of 0.09 MJ/2011 USD PPP.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1990 it was China ahead.
Belarus ranks 48th and China ranks 49th of 189 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and China in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.85 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 11.08 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 0.771 MJ/2011 USD PPP | Belarus |
| 2000s | 6.63 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 5.96 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 0.6695 MJ/2011 USD PPP | Belarus |
| 2010s | 4.64 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 4.65 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 0.0161 MJ/2011 USD PPP | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy intensity by sector, Belarus or China?
- Belarus, at 4.6 MJ/2011 USD PPP against 4.51 MJ/2011 USD PPP in China as of 2012.
- What is the difference in energy intensity by sector between Belarus and China?
- 0.09 MJ/2011 USD PPP, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and China?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2012.
- How do Belarus and China rank globally for energy intensity by sector?
- Belarus ranks 48th and China ranks 49th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank and IEA (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Energy intensity by sector. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Energy intensity level of final energy (MJ/2011 USD PPP): A ratio between final energy consumption and gross domestic product measured at purchasing power parity. Energy intensity is an indication of how much energy is used to produce one unit of economic output. Lower ratio indicates that less energy is used to produce one unit of output.