Guatemala vs Rwanda: Energy intensity by sector
Guatemala
3.39 MJ/2011 USD PPP
in 2012
Rwanda
3.4 MJ/2011 USD PPP
in 2012
Guatemala rank
85th
Rwanda rank
84th
Energy intensity by sector over time
- Guatemala
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 3.4 MJ/2011 USD PPP against 3.39 MJ/2011 USD PPP in Guatemala, a difference of 0.01 MJ/2011 USD PPP.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 85th and Rwanda ranks 84th of 189 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.43 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 9.69 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 6.26 MJ/2011 USD PPP | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 3.24 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 6.22 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 2.98 MJ/2011 USD PPP | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 3.46 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 4.04 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 0.5784 MJ/2011 USD PPP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy intensity by sector, Guatemala or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 3.4 MJ/2011 USD PPP against 3.39 MJ/2011 USD PPP in Guatemala as of 2012.
- What is the difference in energy intensity by sector between Guatemala and Rwanda?
- 0.01 MJ/2011 USD PPP, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Rwanda?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2012.
- How do Guatemala and Rwanda rank globally for energy intensity by sector?
- Guatemala ranks 85th and Rwanda ranks 84th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank and IEA (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Energy intensity by sector. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Energy intensity level of final energy (MJ/2011 USD PPP): A ratio between final energy consumption and gross domestic product measured at purchasing power parity. Energy intensity is an indication of how much energy is used to produce one unit of economic output. Lower ratio indicates that less energy is used to produce one unit of output.