Rwanda vs Thailand: Energy intensity by sector
Rwanda
3.4 MJ/2011 USD PPP
in 2012
Thailand
3.32 MJ/2011 USD PPP
in 2012
Rwanda rank
84th
Thailand rank
86th
Energy intensity by sector over time
- Rwanda
- Thailand
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 3.4 MJ/2011 USD PPP against 3.32 MJ/2011 USD PPP in Thailand, a difference of 0.08 MJ/2011 USD PPP.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 84th and Thailand ranks 86th of 189 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.69 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 3.31 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 6.38 MJ/2011 USD PPP | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 6.22 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 3.34 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 2.89 MJ/2011 USD PPP | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 4.04 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 3.31 MJ/2011 USD PPP | 0.7224 MJ/2011 USD PPP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher energy intensity by sector, Rwanda or Thailand?
- Rwanda, at 3.4 MJ/2011 USD PPP against 3.32 MJ/2011 USD PPP in Thailand as of 2012.
- What is the difference in energy intensity by sector between Rwanda and Thailand?
- 0.08 MJ/2011 USD PPP, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Thailand?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2012.
- How do Rwanda and Thailand rank globally for energy intensity by sector?
- Rwanda ranks 84th and Thailand ranks 86th of 189 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank and IEA (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Energy intensity by sector. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Energy intensity level of final energy (MJ/2011 USD PPP): A ratio between final energy consumption and gross domestic product measured at purchasing power parity. Energy intensity is an indication of how much energy is used to produce one unit of economic output. Lower ratio indicates that less energy is used to produce one unit of output.