Kiribati vs Western Sahara: Electricity generation from fossil fuels per person
Kiribati
223.01 kilowatt-hours
in 2024
Western Sahara
227.87 kilowatt-hours
in 2009
Kiribati rank
155th
Western Sahara rank
154th
Electricity generation from fossil fuels per person over time
- Kiribati
- Western Sahara
How they compare
Western Sahara currently reports 227.87 kilowatt-hours against 223.01 kilowatt-hours in Kiribati, a difference of 4.86 kilowatt-hours.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Western Sahara ahead.
Kiribati ranks 155th and Western Sahara ranks 154th of 210 countries.
Western Sahara has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher electricity generation from fossil fuels per person, Kiribati or Western Sahara?
- Western Sahara, at 227.87 kilowatt-hours against 223.01 kilowatt-hours in Kiribati as of 2009.
- What is the difference in electricity generation from fossil fuels per person between Kiribati and Western Sahara?
- 4.86 kilowatt-hours, with Western Sahara ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Western Sahara?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2009.
- How do Kiribati and Western Sahara rank globally for electricity generation from fossil fuels per person?
- Kiribati ranks 155th and Western Sahara ranks 154th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Ember (2026) and other sources – with major processing by Our World in Data, published as Electricity generation from fossil fuels per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Electricity generation from coal, oil, and gas, measured in kilowatt-hours per person.