Argentina vs Turkmenistan: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Argentina
186.9
in 2025
Turkmenistan
125.47
in 1996
Argentina rank
66th
Turkmenistan rank
69th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Argentina
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 186.9 against 125.47 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 61.43.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.5 times Turkmenistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Argentina ranks 66th and Turkmenistan ranks 69th of 79 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 413.41 | 1,056 | 642.72 | Turkmenistan |
| 1990s | 275.85 | 381.37 | 105.52 | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Argentina or Turkmenistan?
- Argentina, at 186.9 against 125.47 in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Argentina and Turkmenistan?
- 61.43, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Turkmenistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1996.
- How do Argentina and Turkmenistan rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Argentina ranks 66th and Turkmenistan ranks 69th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.