Belarus vs Brazil: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Belarus
1,201
in 2025
Brazil
772.29
in 2025
Belarus rank
42nd
Brazil rank
44th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Belarus
- Brazil
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1,201 against 772.29 in Brazil, a difference of 428.71.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.6 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 42nd and Brazil ranks 44th of 78 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Brazil | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2,705 | 864.35 | 1,840 | Belarus |
| 1990s | 1,564 | 826.63 | 737.83 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 824.2 | 817.16 | 7.04 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,089 | 934.88 | 154.53 | Belarus |
| 2020s | 1,161 | 801.97 | 358.68 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Belarus or Brazil?
- Belarus, at 1,201 against 772.29 in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Belarus and Brazil?
- 428.71, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Brazil?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Brazil rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Belarus ranks 42nd and Brazil ranks 44th of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.