Belarus vs Colombia: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Belarus
1,201
in 2025
Colombia
735.96
in 2025
Belarus rank
42nd
Colombia rank
45th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Belarus
- Colombia
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 1,201 against 735.96 in Colombia, a difference of 465.04.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.6 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 42nd and Colombia ranks 45th of 78 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 4 and Colombia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Colombia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2,705 | 1,249 | 1,456 | Belarus |
| 1990s | 1,564 | 979.61 | 584.86 | Belarus |
| 2000s | 824.2 | 806.29 | 17.91 | Belarus |
| 2010s | 1,089 | 1,163 | 73.28 | Colombia |
| 2020s | 1,161 | 927.62 | 233.03 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Belarus or Colombia?
- Belarus, at 1,201 against 735.96 in Colombia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Belarus and Colombia?
- 465.04, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Colombia?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Colombia rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Belarus ranks 42nd and Colombia ranks 45th of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.