Belarus vs Norway: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Belarus
1,201
in 2025
Norway
1,525
in 2025
Belarus rank
42nd
Norway rank
39th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Belarus
- Norway
How they compare
Norway currently reports 1,525 against 1,201 in Belarus, a difference of 324.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.3 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 41 shared years of data; in 1985 it was Norway ahead.
Belarus ranks 42nd and Norway ranks 39th of 78 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 2,705 | 2,742 | 37.16 | Norway |
| 1990s | 1,564 | 2,354 | 789.28 | Norway |
| 2000s | 824.2 | 1,897 | 1,073 | Norway |
| 2010s | 1,089 | 1,809 | 719.87 | Norway |
| 2020s | 1,161 | 1,626 | 465.8 | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Belarus or Norway?
- Norway, at 1,525 against 1,201 in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Belarus and Norway?
- 324, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Norway?
- 41 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 2025.
- How do Belarus and Norway rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Belarus ranks 42nd and Norway ranks 39th of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.