Belgium vs Slovenia: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Belgium
2,852
in 2025
Slovenia
2,586
in 2025
Belgium rank
27th
Slovenia rank
28th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Belgium
- Slovenia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 2,852 against 2,586 in Slovenia, a difference of 266.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 27th and Slovenia ranks 28th of 79 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10,106 | 8,218 | 1,888 | Belgium |
| 2000s | 6,142 | 8,667 | 2,525 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 3,451 | 6,867 | 3,416 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 2,611 | 4,266 | 1,654 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Belgium or Slovenia?
- Belgium, at 2,852 against 2,586 in Slovenia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Belgium and Slovenia?
- 266, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Slovenia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Slovenia rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Belgium ranks 27th and Slovenia ranks 28th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.