Brazil vs Croatia: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Brazil
772.29
in 2025
Croatia
692.23
in 2025
Brazil rank
45th
Croatia rank
47th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Brazil
- Croatia
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 772.29 against 692.23 in Croatia, a difference of 80.06.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Croatia ahead.
Brazil ranks 45th and Croatia ranks 47th of 79 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Croatia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Croatia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 826.63 | 796.44 | 30.19 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 817.16 | 1,634 | 817.1 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 934.88 | 1,603 | 667.77 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 801.97 | 988.49 | 186.51 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Brazil or Croatia?
- Brazil, at 772.29 against 692.23 in Croatia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Brazil and Croatia?
- 80.06, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Croatia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Croatia rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Brazil ranks 45th and Croatia ranks 47th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.