Brazil vs Singapore: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Brazil
772.29
in 2025
Singapore
673.05
in 2025
Brazil rank
45th
Singapore rank
48th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Brazil
- Singapore
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 772.29 against 673.05 in Singapore, a difference of 99.24.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Singapore's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 45th and Singapore ranks 48th of 79 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 252.37 | 24.93 | 227.44 | Brazil |
| 1970s | 366.02 | 17.63 | 348.39 | Brazil |
| 1980s | 734.7 | 31.04 | 703.66 | Brazil |
| 1990s | 826.63 | 38.96 | 787.67 | Brazil |
| 2000s | 817.16 | 14.06 | 803.1 | Brazil |
| 2010s | 934.88 | 701.61 | 233.27 | Brazil |
| 2020s | 801.97 | 778.97 | 23 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Brazil or Singapore?
- Brazil, at 772.29 against 673.05 in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Brazil and Singapore?
- 99.24, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Singapore?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Singapore rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Brazil ranks 45th and Singapore ranks 48th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.