Croatia vs Singapore: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Croatia
692.23
in 2025
Singapore
673.05
in 2025
Croatia rank
47th
Singapore rank
48th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Croatia
- Singapore
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 692.23 against 673.05 in Singapore, a difference of 19.18.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 47th and Singapore ranks 48th of 79 countries.
Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 796.44 | 38.96 | 757.48 | Croatia |
| 2000s | 1,634 | 14.06 | 1,620 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 1,603 | 701.61 | 901.04 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 988.49 | 778.97 | 209.52 | Croatia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Croatia or Singapore?
- Croatia, at 692.23 against 673.05 in Singapore as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Croatia and Singapore?
- 19.18, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Singapore?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Singapore rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Croatia ranks 47th and Singapore ranks 48th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.