Finland vs North Macedonia: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Finland
3,784
in 2025
North Macedonia
4,208
in 2025
Finland rank
23rd
North Macedonia rank
21st
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Finland
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 4,208 against 3,784 in Finland, a difference of 424.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 23rd and North Macedonia ranks 21st of 79 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 13,205 | 8,004 | 5,201 | Finland |
| 2000s | 13,999 | 7,923 | 6,075 | Finland |
| 2010s | 9,864 | 6,490 | 3,375 | Finland |
| 2020s | 4,993 | 4,610 | 383.07 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Finland or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at 4,208 against 3,784 in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Finland and North Macedonia?
- 424, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and North Macedonia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Finland and North Macedonia rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Finland ranks 23rd and North Macedonia ranks 21st of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.