Iceland vs Slovenia: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Iceland
2,306
in 2025
Slovenia
2,586
in 2025
Iceland rank
31st
Slovenia rank
28th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Iceland
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 2,586 against 2,306 in Iceland, a difference of 280.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
Across all 36 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 31st and Slovenia ranks 28th of 79 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,671 | 8,218 | 5,546 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 3,912 | 8,667 | 4,755 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 3,616 | 6,867 | 3,252 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 2,967 | 4,266 | 1,298 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Iceland or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 2,586 against 2,306 in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Iceland and Slovenia?
- 280, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Slovenia?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Slovenia rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Iceland ranks 31st and Slovenia ranks 28th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.