Latvia vs Turkmenistan: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Latvia
86.28
in 2025
Turkmenistan
125.47
in 1996
Latvia rank
70th
Turkmenistan rank
69th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Latvia
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 125.47 against 86.28 in Latvia, a difference of 39.19.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 1.5 times Latvia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 70th and Turkmenistan ranks 69th of 79 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3,556 | 1,056 | 2,500 | Latvia |
| 1990s | 2,098 | 381.37 | 1,717 | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Latvia or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 125.47 against 86.28 in Latvia as of 1996.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Latvia and Turkmenistan?
- 39.19, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Turkmenistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1985 to 1996.
- How do Latvia and Turkmenistan rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Latvia ranks 70th and Turkmenistan ranks 69th of 79 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.