Morocco vs Norway: Fossil fuel cons per capita
Morocco
2,034
in 2025
Norway
1,525
in 2025
Morocco rank
36th
Norway rank
39th
Fossil fuel cons per capita over time
- Morocco
- Norway
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 2,034 against 1,525 in Norway, a difference of 509.
That makes Morocco's figure about 1.3 times Norway's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 61 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Norway ahead.
Morocco ranks 36th and Norway ranks 39th of 78 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 205.57 | 2,330 | 2,124 | Norway |
| 1970s | 259.65 | 2,676 | 2,416 | Norway |
| 1980s | 374.09 | 2,790 | 2,416 | Norway |
| 1990s | 716.47 | 2,354 | 1,637 | Norway |
| 2000s | 1,297 | 1,897 | 600.07 | Norway |
| 2010s | 1,370 | 1,809 | 439.42 | Norway |
| 2020s | 2,158 | 1,626 | 531.78 | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher fossil fuel cons per capita, Morocco or Norway?
- Morocco, at 2,034 against 1,525 in Norway as of 2025.
- What is the difference in fossil fuel cons per capita between Morocco and Norway?
- 509, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Norway?
- 61 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2025.
- How do Morocco and Norway rank globally for fossil fuel cons per capita?
- Morocco ranks 36th and Norway ranks 39th of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Fossil fuel cons per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.